My thoughts for a GUI 1.0 | looking for a frontend developer :)

Development UX
65

yes I know them - but don’t you think the first capital letter wouldn’t be unambiguously? (who came up with such a word? oO ) the colored box with the first letter combines the real name of the device (by first letter) and the color, which is also used next to the local devices name and as contour of the navbar…

for example: you have two devices with similar colors, the identicon would not really help I think…

66

The only problem is that the device name can be set differently on every node. So it might be confusing in some cases.

So I’m not really sure, just wanted to say that identicons don’t have to be grey :wink:

1 Like
67

I know :blush: that’s why I hope that we could change from identicons to color & first letter :yum: google is using this not without any reasons :grin:

68

next try:

69

aaand:

70

I think you’re missing the point. As Nutomic said:

So the icons may not be consistent across all devices, which may be confusing.

1 Like
71

ahh - true :grin:

one thought: wouldn’t you name one device the same way?

if there are several people using syncthing and syncing to one central device, this should not be a problem - they only see their own given name and the color set by this device. right? :flushed:

72

And also: I call my Nas: “NAS” but my friend calls my Nas in his Syncthing completely different, i guess…

1 Like
73

hmm well I see. :blush:

74

Update 09.07. (see pics above) Changelog

todo:

  • use one(!) icon “framework” for consistency (tbd)
  • fix cpu & ram data oO

@sgilani: what do you think?

1 Like
75

Thank you for your update!

My I ask you to include the identicons also for the devices side? Something like this:

0a3442a058473ba8a75408ed8638c1a82d82e8df.jpg1345×636 67.1 KB

76

let me think about - this could get a bit narrow on the devices side… these circles were a indicator for online, offline etc… so cant’t replace them without substitute…

77

long time, no update :yum:

just added some hopefully upcoming(?) features to the

  • foldersettings and
  • the “home screen” and the “remove button” to the foldersettings

syncthing_desk.jpg1920×1080 322 KB
syncthing_foldersettings.jpg1920×1080 332 KB

78

Is there a way to use this layout in syncthing now?

79

unfortunately not :confused: unless you are able to develop this piece of code :smile:

1 Like
80

oO is there anyone who has the leisure to do this for us? :cry:

1 Like
81

Maybe the devs could start a small crowd-sourcing campaign in kickstarter or similar

1 Like
83

good idea :slightly_smiling:

what should be the financial goal?

I know that @sgilani has a little development company in spain - maybe he could help out with pricing and developing?

84

I want to add my voice here. And I’ll be as straightforward as possible.

This whole discussion hasn’t lead to any improvement in my view. The current GUI is very capable as it is already. The way I see it, there are so many issues to be worked on before even considering adjustments/rework on the GUI.

For example, implementing a “real” GUI. Which is to say, a GUI that doesn’t depend on a web browser - of any kind.

1 Like
85

Given that syncthing is very much still in active development, I think creating native guis at this point would be counterproductive. It would significantly increase the effort associated with adding new features, as some work would have to be duplicated across the different platforms.

When syncthing hits version 1.0, then it might make more sense to consider native guis. Until then, we have things like SyncTrayzor and Syncthing-GTK.

4 Likes