RFC: Syncing extended attributes

Size does matter, because I’m proposing to treat this as metadata, not file data. That means it gets passed around with the rest of the file metadata and saved to the database. Hence the proposal noting limits in the number of and size of these attributes. That said, I do think NTFS alternate streams fit in as “extended attributes”.

(The alternative is more complex, and wildly inefficient in the presumably most common case of multiple small attributes.)

1 Like